Search results

People surprised by Cyberpunk's state seem to forget how awful the Witcher III was at launch. How short people's memories seem to be. Granted, Cyberpunk was worse but I think a big part of that was the runaway hype train CDPR created for the game over the better part of a decade.

The problem is that Starfield only really has copy and pasted POI's and very little out there to see. You have a huge environment that contains nothing. The world traversal isn't very good either. The vehicle sucks and before we even had that you had to run everywhere.

I'm even more sick of "AI" in marketing than I am of the lower case "i" added to everything after the iMAC came out.

That would require massive replacement of buildings and game assets as well as changing the main protagonist. They also need to switch out all the flags which were used without permission of that family and buy up all those statues of the broken gate etc. and put them in a landfill or melt them...

They generally don't. Most DLCs aren't really large enough to warrant it and even if they were, they don't usually alter the basic gameplay. That said, we saw lots of reviews for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, but it also coincided with a very large patch that overhauled a lot of the games'...

This is how the game industry has worked since at least the early 2000's. I used to know a lot of people in the industry back in the day. None of those people work in that industry anymore for various reasons. I think "contracting policies" is probably code for hiring people on criteria other...

I fixed that for you. What's interesting is that Ubisoft has never cared about quality or a polished day one experience. Day one release on Steam is really just an attempt to get more people to buy the game as a lot of people hate Ubisoft's trash Ubiconnect (or whatever its called) launcher.

It's a Ubisoft game. It may not be unplayable but its probably in a terrible state which will render it unplayable for some people. All Ubisoft games seem to ship this way to some degree. Every game I can think of I've played from them was barely functional at launch. They could reverse course...

I don't know if they are going to delay the game or not. However, they are certainly not showing it in Japan given the negative publicity they've already received from Japanese gamers. They'd likely be laughed off the stage for showing that piece of crap in Japan.

I was a huge fan of these games back in the day. Too bad I don't have a PS anything.

After the craptastic Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League game, I don't think the studio has it in them to do a decent follow up to that series.

I lost interest at the pretentious title.

Not Sony apparently. I can help predict failures before they happen. Their next game, "Fairgames" may do even worse. They need to shut that pile of **** down before they tarnish the Playstation brand anymore. The only people who are going to make money on that dumpster fire will be the...

DEI makes games DIE.

Even some of the ones that are still around aren't the same. That includes Tom's and PC Perspective.

In this case maybe. But with Quake / Quake II RTX, the game is largely unchanged. They just added ray tracing and that's it. Half-Life 2 RTX looks quite a bit better as a result of larger changes.

As David said earlier, Anandtech hasn't been the same in about a decade. This is when Anand retired and it was purchased by the same media company that owns Tom's Hardware.

Since 2015, I've used a 48" and a 49" Samsung TV and an Alienware 34" prior to the Acer 43" CG437KP I use currently. Prior to that I was using 3x30" Dell 3007WFP-HC's. I got my first 30" in 2007 or 2008. I've been using larger displays for almost a decade. Dropping to 27" doesn't appeal what so...

I fixed that for you.

This is probably the first indie title I've ever seen that actually looked like it was worth playing.