Search results

looks pretty good. I liked playing both at the arcade. Wonder if they will be available for PC eventually.

This has been rumored since dlss was announced for UE. So this is only natural. Thing is that unity is much more popular on mobile where there's virtually no nvidia presence.

Thankfully this will all be solved when Ampere Next arrives. ;) ;) :rolleyes::rolleyes:

I think its more like the CPU to GPU channels which would allow the cpu to access the gpus via a high bandwidth bus. Rather than integrating tensor cores to a cpu. I mean why would you want that when you are tied to an AmpereNext GPU anyway.

This has been Jensen's dream for as long as I can remember, had a couple of bad starts, but this seems to be the real deal.

With the exception of volta (which was basically a souped up pascal + tensor cores). Every nvidia architechture starts or ends up in consumer gaming cards.

I recall nintendo releasing a few titles exclusively for the shield TV console in china. I don't know what happened to that.

Didn't sony try this before?

This may be my best chance to grab a RTX 3000 :p :D ;)

I've said this dozens of times, not only do you get great performance hardware with nvidia, but better support and middleware that makes it a much better choice. Cry all you want for OpenCL, CUDA is the de facto standard in many content creation applications. OPTIX is also orders of magnitude...

Seeing the issues you had with the 11900K version, it doesn't bode well...

I'd prefer a matte finish myself but overall it looks pretty good.

What I mean is that if its not seen as a single GPU by the OS then it could be some sort of multi-gpu implemetation (crossfire) and that would need both game and driver support. I recall intel had promised that multicore cpus could eventually accelerate single core applications. That never...

I'm curious as to how can AMD/intel/nvidia manage to make all the chiplets appear as one for the OS.

Mandatory... But can it play crysis? :p :p

:p :D

There are several games mainly Control and Death Stranding that look much better than native res under DLSS2.0 quality mode @4k, at least in my experience.

I agree that DLSS is best used at 4K where it can look better than native DLSS at 1080p doesn't look nearly as good as native and 1440p looks about the same IMO.

DLSS has a few modes. There's quality mode, which can give better than native resolution and depending on the game about 40~60% performance improvement. Then comes mixed mode which depending on the game looks about as good as quality mode and somewhat faster. Next comes performance mode the one...

DLSS performance mode is too blurry for my taste, it looks no different from regular upscaling except for the AA. I guess nvidia is trying to counter AMDs upcoming SuperResolution which apparently should be comparable to DLSS performance mode on IQ/perf.