AMD Is Reportedly Skipping the RX 7700 XT in Order to Focus on the RX 7600 as Consumer Demand Shifts toward Lower-Priced Offerings

[Peter_Brosdahl]

Some dedicated AIB partners have told Igor Wallossek that AMD is reportedly skipping the Radeon 7700 XT, for now. This news comes as some retailers have told the tech reviewer that they are seeing consumers focusing on either buying flagship offerings such as NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4090 or going the opposite direction seeking the lowest-priced cards they can find leaving the mid-tier cards largely sitting on the shelf. In turn, it has been speculated by these partners that AMD's plan is to put a greater focus on the more affordable entry-level tier segment instead. These board partners have told Igor that they already have market-ready Radeon RX 7600 models ready to show at the upcoming Computex event.

Meanwhile, partners that produce graphics cards for both AMD and NVIDIA are said to using a wait-and-see strategy to see how the market fares. NVIDIA recently released its GeForce RTX 4070, and Igor also confirmed that the RTX 4060 Ti will launch in May/June, but while the RTX 4070 has received favorable reviews many have criticized its price. This also happened with the RTX 4080. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is believed to be a more direct competitor to the GeForce RTX 4070 but as many retailers continue to see newly launched NVIDIA cards sit on shelves it is believed that AMD would rather not risk lost profits in competing at a price point that consumers are not showing interest in.

See full article...

 

[Grimlakin]

I don't know how I feel about this. Unless margins are just that thin this isn't a kindness to consumers but a protection of profit margin. If consumers are not willing to buy big on video cards AMD and Nvidia needs to decrease margin or find another way to protect margin and still deliver performance to the consumer. Not so long ago 500-800 was top tier for video cards. Now did that serve 4k with all the bells and whistles... no... but finding a path forward to meet both wants of the consumer will be best.

This isn't freaking bread and milk. You can't just charge what you want and expect consumers to line up around the block. Not unless you got a few hundred million to blow on advertising. Even then that's a flash in the pan purchase for many.

 

[kcthebrewer]

If the 7600 can perform similar to the 6700XT, they have themselves a great opportunity to steal market share.

I'm skeptical it's only going to be a ~15% upgrade though which is DOA.

 

[Brian_B]

Well, when "mid-tier" suddenly costs as much as high-tier used to cost..

You've always had the people willing to spend almost any amount of money, and they are still there, spending almost any amount of money.

And the budget-conscious people, they haven't changed their budgets really. Just the definition of "Mid-tier" has now become $500-800.... Just the 6700XT card that kc is talking about - that's a $480 MSRP, and even today is going for $350+, and that lower price by itself used to be the top of a lot of budgets of people that I knew that were putting together computers. And the market under that, which used to be very large and healthy? Pretty much just Intel now and some really really bad options from the major players.

I think it's a marketing mistake. I get what they are thinking: if you force someone to choose a new card and their only options are high end with very high margin, you preserve the margin. And ok, that's true. But when you've outpriced an entire section of the market, you've lost all those sales.

I don't mind the margin so much, I guess. Ultimately, the cards cost what they cost (margin included). But nVidia and AMD have both just given up on the lower end. Although, Apple does more or less the same thing with iPhones. They don't really make a budget iPhone... if you want a cheap one, you get one that's 2 or 3 model years back, and that's what we've seen AMD/nVidia move to recently. Maybe that works and just has to be good enough? I still can't really wrap my head around it though.

 

[Uvilla]

Well, sales slowing down, and product lines getting simplified?, if trends continue perhaps we will go back to pre pandemic pre cryto, more customer friendly markets.
I think this absurd thing of having 50 models across 50 tiers was getting out of control. With nvidia being 100x100.
If its true market is slowing down I think its likely we will see 3 or so distinct chips from AMD and Nvidia ( high mid low, and its size change accordingly in silicon terms) along with corresponding reference models, then AIB will do their style for each h,m,l and thats that. Variation might happen across brands as they compete. I think we may stop seeing say msi making 5 different 4070, 8 different 4080s and so on. All that costs money, well wastes money.

 

[kcthebrewer]

Well, sales slowing down, and product lines getting simplified?, if trends continue perhaps we will go back to pre pandemic pre cryto, more customer friendly markets.
I think this absurd thing of having 50 models across 50 tiers was getting out of control. With nvidia being 100x100.
If its true market is slowing down I think its likely we will see 3 or so distinct chips from AMD and Nvidia ( high mid low, and its size change accordingly in silicon terms) along with corresponding reference models, then AIB will do their style for each h,m,l and thats that. Variation might happen across brands as they compete. I think we may stop seeing say msi making 5 different 4070, 8 different 4080s and so on. All that costs money, well wastes money.

I look at motherboard manufacturers and the absurd amount of models they release when there is so much overlap for no reason.

If both NVIDIA and AMD don't have at least 7 models on the market by year end I'll be surprised.