Recent content by Stoly

looks pretty good. I liked playing both at the arcade. Wonder if they will be available for PC eventually.

This has been rumored since dlss was announced for UE. So this is only natural. Thing is that unity is much more popular on mobile where there's virtually no nvidia presence.

Thankfully this will all be solved when Ampere Next arrives. ;) ;) :rolleyes::rolleyes:

I think its more like the CPU to GPU channels which would allow the cpu to access the gpus via a high bandwidth bus. Rather than integrating tensor cores to a cpu. I mean why would you want that when you are tied to an AmpereNext GPU anyway.

This has been Jensen's dream for as long as I can remember, had a couple of bad starts, but this seems to be the real deal.

With the exception of volta (which was basically a souped up pascal + tensor cores). Every nvidia architechture starts or ends up in consumer gaming cards.

I recall nintendo releasing a few titles exclusively for the shield TV console in china. I don't know what happened to that.

Didn't sony try this before?

This may be my best chance to grab a RTX 3000 :p :D ;)

I've said this dozens of times, not only do you get great performance hardware with nvidia, but better support and middleware that makes it a much better choice. Cry all you want for OpenCL, CUDA is the de facto standard in many content creation applications. OPTIX is also orders of magnitude...

Seeing the issues you had with the 11900K version, it doesn't bode well...

I'd prefer a matte finish myself but overall it looks pretty good.

What I mean is that if its not seen as a single GPU by the OS then it could be some sort of multi-gpu implemetation (crossfire) and that would need both game and driver support. I recall intel had promised that multicore cpus could eventually accelerate single core applications. That never...

I'm curious as to how can AMD/intel/nvidia manage to make all the chiplets appear as one for the OS.

Mandatory... But can it play crysis? :p :p