Search results

They're encrypting the signals from the mouse buttons, and you need the subscription service to decrypt them. The HID Driver won't know it's a click or not.. ;)

I didn't misread the article. I did take other reviews into my OPINION on the matter. If having an opinion you don't like placing me in "Intel Marketing" territory, then so be it..

So all we get basically this go-around is better power-efficiency.. I mean, that's all well and good but this was AMD's chance to put their foot on Intel's throat and they missed the mark... Thank you Brent for a thorough review as always!

Hell.. I still have an old Vizio 32" TV from back in 2007?? **** thing is still kicking and screaming to this day. Thick sides.. Little heavy to carry but ****, that thing takes a licking and keeps on ticking.

Right now its AMD's turn to take advantage of the situation. Like LazyGamer said, AMD had exploding CPUs last year. Both sides have had their issues along the way. AMD's recent delay of the release of the 9000 series CPUs should be a sign that not all is right in the AMD camp too. It's sad...

All is good. I was able to do just that Dan.

How are they able to roll out an update when the server in question BSODs on boot? I've got one system at a place that I can't even deploy the "delete driver files" fix because the machine is also running Bitlocker. The drive isn't available to Safemode or Recovery Command Prompt.

Links are swapped for the 4070 Ti Super's..

They've got the Final Shape:

Same - Watching with intrigue...

Thanks for the article Brent! I was most amazed at the almost similar power consumption of the 2 cards, while sporting 100% gains in performance..

You're not forced to buy a GPU, but if you want a GPU, and you want a mid-tier card, you're forced to spend $500+ for it. Unless you settle for a much lesser powered card in the $200-$300 range..

Willing or Have No Choice?? I think the latter..

ProxMox just introduced automated ESXi to ProxMox migration (currently in their Testing Channel). I've started to play with both XCP-ng and ProxMox for ESXi migrations. Neither have been flawless but overall it hasn't been a horrible experience either. XCP-ng requires 8.3 Beta 1+ in order for...

Yep.. Main page.. Desktop:

Sadly there isn't a break :( Broadcom when full-on stupid with their plans for VMWare. I don't nearly have the infrastructure you're having to manage (roughly 256 cores for my 6 hosts) and as a Non-profit the pricing just isn't sustainable.

This is roughly correct.. I don't believe you can under-license the cores and get things to work (license for 16 cores when you have 32 available on the CPU). Broadcom is hacking the living daylights out of the product to make it completely unusable by small/medium sized business and home...

There is a Migration path directly from XO for ESXi VMs to XCP-NG. It's currently bugged if you use the latest "Release" version of 8.2.1 for XCP-NG and it's supposedly fixed in the 8.3-B2 release of XCP-NG. I'm going to be playing with an upgrade of my testbench to 8.3-B2 and try another set...

Licensing has been the sole reason why I haven't gone apeshit on building a killer host with dual EPYC's in it. I'm in the process of testbenching XCP-NG though, and very well may make a cluster of dual EPYC's (for HA/Redundancy) for the majority of guests.

Exactly.. Sad state things are in.