Search results

I recently bought the Hisense 85" U8N with mini-LED and 2200 dimming zones. TV is phenomenal. Barely puts off any heat.

No reason to do a headset deep dive. They're all equally garbage in terms of fidelity and quality. The fidelity can be summed up by the extremely small discrete DAC's and amp's they put in them. They can put the best speakers and magnets on the planet inside these headsets and they'll still...

At the very least they could mention a price. That being said I've never been impressed with any "gaming headset" regardless of the features and specs.

Oh yeah, baby!

Yeah I don't see this staying up very long.

I'm going to wait for the Super Ultra Mega Supreme Extreme version.

I just think about in the context that this Acer monitor is being touted as the best new display for gaming. It's 24" 1080P at 600 hz. That's just dogpoop considering we had those displays 15 years ago. And not only that, but the picture was worlds better and brighter than these TN panels. I...

I've always wondered why they don't make plasma gaming monitors. They were 600 hz back in the late 00's.

It's been shown numerous times that game load times are not really effected by disk speed beyond a point. I think it was GN that tested it with gen 3 and 4 drives. The load times were identical, within margin of error in testing. You're basically limited at the OS layer and game engine's ability...

Pretty soon we'll need dedicated 30 amp service to run a gaming PC.

Data is useless without also seeing clocks, temps, GPU used.

First GPU I bought in 1996 was a Diamond Stealth 3D 3000, which was S3 Virge based. It was ok at the time, but lacked OGL support. I remember upgrading, maybe a year or so later, to an ATi Rage Pro, just to play Quake. Was running it on a Pentium Pro 166. I got stupid lucky by finding that PC...

Win 11 is so good that M$ hasn't moved their server OS to it yet.

No way I'm switching to it on my gaming PC. Not until they've ironed out all the issues.

That's why I watch MX and SMX. Best rider wins.

I'm getting hit with another 28 GB update. I haven't bought or pre-purchased anything. That's 104 GB in a few days when nothing changed on my side.

Every Apex pro uses a controller. Nearly every COD pro uses a controller. Basically, if the game can use a controller and has aim assist a pro will be using a controller for it. And wireless has gotten so good that there's basically zero benefit to using a wired. Aim assist is a joke...

PBO might give you another 10-15 watts. This is a 40W jump. That's a lot of extra power, for AMD. Meanwhile Intel over there like "105W? LOL....our sheeit idles higher than that!"

it still has single player campaign.

Odd that I'm getting a 75.9 GB update to COD? Wouldn't be surprised if they're just forcing people to download it so at launch there isn't a massive bog on Steam and Battle.net.