Search results

Team T & A? Sign me up!!

Check with at&t or comcast, ask about a fiber solution. Fiber is on more current backbones altogether.

I mean Intel could name there stuff after Mask vehicles. ;)

the TBW is 2x the 4 TB drive so it's greater... just for that kind of size.. I'd want more durability. But that's just me.

Honestly I would do a query analyzer to see what your query is doing. Search for a 3rd party tool for the DB software you're using?

Do you have indexes of the specific data in question created for the tables being queried? Do you know the job that is running for the report, is it using good syntax to prevent things like full table scans where it is not needed? I'm thinking a good index and optimized query will help a...

I wish you luck. I love my 2.5 gig pipe.

OOF... while I like mine... I don't know that I would consider spending 1k for 8TB in a single drive. At least not right now. ESPECIALLY for consumer grade TBW.

Ah, yea our demand for minimal latency is extreme. Part because our vendors DB design is... very specific. I'll leave that as is. And part just because of the nature of what we do. We track the nanoseconds of every jump in our DB (via triggers) to make sure that we have everything as...

Oh ok that's cool. My clusters don't have nodes.. errr actually they do I we just don't like the idea of having our DB's in the cluster.. Sharing IOP's is not for us, nor is setting up direct mapped shares per host for the VM's themselves... I suppose I could read up on doing that, haven't...

Again this is all use case based. There isn't a blanket this way is fastest all of the time... I mean other than having enough ram to load your entire database into memory....

Smaller SQL boxes... SURE all day every day but the core reducing/binding isn't for those environments. some VM infrastructure you can just assign more priority to existing threads .. but SQL licensing is just so **** expensive you need to be running a cluster for all SQL for it to make sense.

You're not running very big SQL servers. :) I don't want to run servers with 32 cores and 512+ gigs of ram as a VM. Not without a 100 gig backbone for vm migration. OOF.

Thank vendors that haven't updated their database design in 20+ years and just keep it compatible with current SQL revisions.

Oddly of those... Assassins creed is what I'm most interested in. I was SO interested in Dune until it was just another pvp survival grind fest. No thanks. I wanted an Dune MMMORPG with survival elements.

We don't know that. If this is a bios level change like SMT to Hyperthreading but in reverse it will appear to the OS as fewer cores... and fewer cores = more performance. Right now we build some of our critical infrastructure with 50% more cores than we need to use day to day, but we turn...

Yes and no.. it is multithreaded happy but being able to reduce core count to accelerate your threads would a boon for some and save on licensing.

I wonder how much the software puts on overhead. This could be awesome for msql servers though. Especially considering license costs.

Great so now I can burn my ENTIRE yard to scorch and it will only cost be 500k in video cards, lasers, actuators, and power generation/storage. Not to mention the tractor itself!

Yea you'll have on ebay to be honest.