Search results

Shut up.... you're mean! ;)

Man if it wasn't for the waterblock I might want it. I'm not ready for custom loops. I think I'm aged past doing that at this point. lol.

You know maybe this one won't cook AMD x3d CPU's?

You can blame Intel for the NPU BS. They stated including 'NPU's in their CPU's with the core ultra's. And they are trash (I have one). They don't do anything to accelerate anyhting. No copilot running local, no local LLM's nothing. Just pure garbage. The integrated on die GPU does...

This game looks so solid im honestly surprised it wasnt for a Nintendo switch exclusively for 80 bucks.

Would i give up my oled to go back to CRT. No. Never. Refresh rate for me isn't the end all be all. Yes it is part of the equation. Im not running a 30hz screen after all. But this chase after refresh rates seems to be more marketing than use case.

Very interesting. Here's hoping for real competition.

I've ran unlimited hz crt monitors.for years.

I still don't get the desire for refresh rates that high. Then again I never ran doom and 320*200 for max FPS either.

Team T & A? Sign me up!!

Check with at&t or comcast, ask about a fiber solution. Fiber is on more current backbones altogether.

I mean Intel could name there stuff after Mask vehicles. ;)

the TBW is 2x the 4 TB drive so it's greater... just for that kind of size.. I'd want more durability. But that's just me.

Honestly I would do a query analyzer to see what your query is doing. Search for a 3rd party tool for the DB software you're using?

Do you have indexes of the specific data in question created for the tables being queried? Do you know the job that is running for the report, is it using good syntax to prevent things like full table scans where it is not needed? I'm thinking a good index and optimized query will help a...

I wish you luck. I love my 2.5 gig pipe.

OOF... while I like mine... I don't know that I would consider spending 1k for 8TB in a single drive. At least not right now. ESPECIALLY for consumer grade TBW.

Ah, yea our demand for minimal latency is extreme. Part because our vendors DB design is... very specific. I'll leave that as is. And part just because of the nature of what we do. We track the nanoseconds of every jump in our DB (via triggers) to make sure that we have everything as...

Oh ok that's cool. My clusters don't have nodes.. errr actually they do I we just don't like the idea of having our DB's in the cluster.. Sharing IOP's is not for us, nor is setting up direct mapped shares per host for the VM's themselves... I suppose I could read up on doing that, haven't...

Again this is all use case based. There isn't a blanket this way is fastest all of the time... I mean other than having enough ram to load your entire database into memory....