Search results

Disney announced 'recently' they were moving away from UHD and projects like The Abyss UHD remaster were cancelled. Hopefully this is true.

They used the x16 slot so it means nothing as M.2 performance will likely be different. No one is going to have an M.2 hooked up like that with a 3090 on anything lower than a TR.

I hope that the miners realize that they are literally shooting themselves in the foot by bypassing it. If a software solution doesn't work the next step is a hardware solution which I have no doubt NVIDIA will have no problem doing.

https://twitter.com/bdelrizzo/status/1362619264423747590 "Hi Ryan. It's not just a driver thing. There is a secure handshake between the driver, the RTX 3060 silicon, and the BIOS (firmware) that prevents removal of the hash rate limiter."

Curious how they are going to do this from a software-perspective. It will either require a ton of driver development (per game/engine) or they need to make multi-gpu a base part of Vulkan and DX before this type of GPU releases. It's likely way too much work ($$$) for a per game/engine...

Do you know why the power draw on the 3080 was so low?

I'd love to know how many cards have been shipped from both companies. All I have to go off of is - 3dmark has duplicate submissions and not everyone uses it but Time Spy over 230,000 submissions for 3080s over 115,000 for 3090s over 75,000 3070s over 12,000 3060 Tis vs over 9,000...

GN was the main one I saw. The 3060 Ti without DLSS is almost 30% faster than the 6900 XT.

That is where the stock is going to. System builders come before DIY and system builders are being overrun with orders. I mean you get an entire system for the price you would pay a scalper. It's a steal. /ugh

Every system builder pretty much. That is where it looks like almost all the stock is going because you can easily buy 30 series cards there.

This is legit better than I was expecting from AMD based on Minecraft results. Dunno if that's because of the extra dynamic visual stuff Minecraft has or not but this is more than adequate to play with the dynamic resolution in Q2

I really think AIB partners are out of touch or AMD's GPU cost to AIBs are way too high. You can get a custom EK waterblock/backplate and the base 6800XT for $50 less than this card. All that is ignoring the $999 6900XT.

I estimated it's performance to be similar to what the 6600XT will be and I got some backlash from AMD reddit. It seems very clear to be 5700XT-like in rasterized performance.

The main thing that killed PC SLI was Unreal Engine 4's incompatibility in DX11. There is no reason a closed ecosystem couldn't massively benefit from multi-gpu.

Game was sold with the promise that all the content DLC is free. They are only charging for battle passes and cosmetics. I can't see any situation that this game turns around. Even free-to-play needs good incentives to continue playing and this game has none.

Beta code should not be used as a comparison tool for public consumption. The only reason AMD should have issued it was specifically so reviewers could say hey AMD ray tracing works well in this game not look how bad Nvidia runs this game comparatively.

This is a case where there wasn't anything to optimize and CDPR already had too much on their plate. That said, the system requirements look like DLSS is pretty much required for playable RT so they are likely working with AMD to get Super Resolution working. There is no excuse for Godfall...

I kind of hope it does 100% require 12GB of VRAM at max settings to see how NVIDIA responds to people after they promised that 10GB would be fine. That said I am more on the side that it allocated 12GB of VRAM and requires much less.

3090 FE 56fps stock 61.25 in benchmark mode 58.25 in everyday overclock mode

My everyday overclocked 3090 FE (I really don't care enough to run it multiple times) with everything I normally have open in the background got 4K - 65 1440p - 110