Search results

My 225 system https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16770383 Vs your 245K https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/compare/16588169?baseline=16770383

So it's bartlett lake, still not sure why everyone thinks this is going to be a much better performing cpu. It's not, it wasn't designed for gaming. For those who actually may get it working I'm sure they will be disappointed in the performance.

I'm not so sure its criminal to run 850w PSUs with 5090s.......Ive used a few 850w PSUs with higher end GPU'S. Seasonic Vertex GX 850 7800x3d + 4090 (Asus strix OC) couldn't get above 750w draw and that was simply hammering furmark and cpu burner (in furmark) Was closer to 650w when just...

Are you bipolar? One day its hate intel for everything, the next day praise intel, it's kind of tiring...

Since everyone loves E-Cores I figured I'l play around with Process Lasso and only assign E-cores to R26. Running them at 5.0ghz Not a terrible result. 16 E-Cores fully loaded was about 160w cpu power consumption

1080p medium, because everyone with a 9800 or 9850 and 5090 makes sure to play at that resolution,

First day hating on intel? Not the first time they release a mobile platform before a desktop platform. Not sure why that's such a big deal. Surely you remember the intel core platform that was mobile first and gave the pentium 4s run for the money before the desktop platform was released...

Haven't really made any progress, tested some other drives with similar (but slightly better results) And now on to the even more baffling problem. I used the 4TB SN850x, made a small c: partition for the windows install, and a separate partition for the data. When I test on the data...

Are you aware how well the Arc B390 performs? Are you aware how well the panther lake cpu's scale at lower clock speeds vs anything AMD has to offer? Sounds like grasping at straws.

There is not, 37W PL2 and 30PL1, Although I've seen it go to 45w briefly Looks like it's performing alright.

I don't care if they do or not, its a repeatable benchmark that was run on both the systems as a comparison

So what score should a low power Lunar lake CPU get with a PL1 limit of 30w be getting if it's such a bad score?

Why do you think its the ram? 226V system 9800X3D system Passmark results, not a super fair comparison, but the 226v has lower memory latency

Ooof the slowest result I've got so far. Aspire 14 AI Core Ultra 5 226V 16GB LPDDR5x 8533 Arc 130V

Using canadian pricing as an example, I don't see an imaginary CPU causing any issues for intel. 265KF is $399 9700x is $460 7800X3D is $550 14900K is $620 9800X3D is $640 9850X3D is $720 285K is $780 Intel is the value leader right now. Given the price of ram. A full $240 difference between...

This problem has me stumped. Picked up an Aspire 14 From Costco. 226V 16GB LPDDR5 8533 1TB WD SN5000S QLC SSD Here is the "stock" performance with the WD drive Since there has been some confusion as to whether Lunar Lake supports Gen 5 SSD's (running them at Gen 5) I decided to put in...

Locally where I am. Some SKUs of 5070Ti's have gone up about $250 (cad$) while others have stayed the same. My MSI Ventus 3X OC 5070Ti has not gone up (none of the MSI cards have) but Asus and Gigabyte have gone up

This is the only review showing less power use vs the 9800x3d, all other tests show the 9850x3d consuming more power.

Looks like PL was exactly what Intel was saying about it's performance. https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Panther-Lake-Core-Ultra-X9-388H-performance-analysis-Outpaces-Arrow-Lake-and-exceeds-Zen-5-in-efficiency.1212583.0.html The GPU performance is impressive...

I don't really care how stupid or smart the average consumer is, where was i talking about consumers? I was simply showing that e-cores are not a waste of space, instead of just talking about things I tested it out. There is no tweaking of that particular game engine, it eats multiple cores...