- Joined
- May 28, 2019
- Messages
- 9,826
- Points
- 113
Seeing as the American taxpayer just bought 433.3 million shares of Intel, DO IT! We could use the ROII'm eyeing a 265KF combo at Microcenter.... $200 less than the 9800x3d bundle. Last several builds have been AM4. And while I have enjoyed the multiple CPU upgrades on AM4 boards..... maybe time to give Intel another shot and save 2 hundy in the process. I know the 9800x3d is the GOAT and all that, but I can't justify $600+ upgrade.. I really don't do all that much gaming. I doubt the X3D cache is going to make Civilization faster LOL.
I have been playing some Civ 6, for reasons that I cannot understand - and no, X3D cache does not make it go faster. It's not any faster than my 12700K was.I doubt the X3D cache is going to make Civilization faster LOL.
I totally forgot about that and great question!12gb a second wall due to their chiplet design?
Honestly, if you're going to game, it's X3D and then there's everything else from AMD and Nvidia. There's just no real comparison IMO, it's worth stretching for.Better off with a 7700X for the same money, and be on a live platform, if you can't afford to pony up for a 3D. Or a 7600X for a $179.
Anyone do recent PCIE 5 NVME speed testing on these. Still hitting the 12gb a second wall due to their chiplet design?
It doesn't matter. Even a PCIe 3.0 x2 drive is almost indistinguishable from a PCIe 5.0 x4 drive for most desktop use, including almost all gaming.I totally forgot about that and great question!
Unless you want a CPU that supplies what it advertises.It doesn't matter. Even a PCIe 3.0 x2 drive is almost indistinguishable from a PCIe 5.0 x4 drive for most desktop use, including almost all gaming.
The boys down under lay it out