- Joined
- May 28, 2019
- Messages
- 9,833
- Points
- 113
It's one thing to surpass a predecessor or competitor, but quite another when a new mobile processor outperforms a top-tier desktop solution.
See full article...
See full article...
If this was about the M series cpu... ok i am interested in an apple pc. But I am stuck solid in the windows world. As software becomes more hardware agnostic it gets more and more attractive.I mean, if this is true:
Single-Threaded Benchmark Percentage Breakdown
- 11% faster than Apple A18 Pro
- 36% faster than Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 11.8% faster than AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
- 15.8% faster than Intel Core i9-14900KS
Then wasn't the old A18Pro chip ~also~ faster than the 9950X and the 14900k?
Sure, they are cherry picking things here. But one fits in the palm of your hand while running the screen and everything, while some of the others need... 1000W power supplies. The tradeoff is, as others have pointed out - sustained performance and the presence of large numbers of core units (multithreading)
I've always been a fan of Apple silicon, and my old M1 Macbook Pro is still chugging along very capably, although the battery only lasts me about 3 days now instead of all week.
Yeah, there isn't much point in the whole Mac vs Windows thing - hardware has become a lot more agnostic. And while both camps have went in different directions, neither has went in a particularly good one.As software becomes more.hardware agnostic it gets more and more attractive.