Search results

Peaked with D2 imo

I could very well see them spinning off GeForce as an independent company or sell it off. Not sure it would make a ton of sense, but I'm not an accountant or business major so I don't know why companies do that in the first place.

Oddly enough, standing underneath a Barber Shop sign, the difference in hair was what drew my eye first. It looks a lot more detailed on the right - but that could just be an artifact of the particular screen shot - can't see it in motion or anything It is also interesting the CPUs appear to be...

Hmm.. it would be interesting. AMD has flirted with it, but they own x64 IP so they don't really want to give that up. I don't know that Intel would unless they are facing another existential crisis - Most of Intel's corporate identity is wrapped up in x86 With Microsoft putting out some...

2 years from now when they get around to actually releasing it in 2028

I dunno, we'll see nVidia tried this once before, and other than the Nintendo Switch, didn't exactly see a lot of traction. And still hasn't. Snapdragon hasn't exactly taken off either. Apple seems to be the only one pulling off ARM outside of phones/mobile, but they are also the only company...

No no no, you have that all wrong. You release the weaker part first, and let everyone jump on it. Then 3 months in, you let the rumor drop about the "better" part. Then 6 months in, some benchmarks start to "leak". Then 9 months or so later, you release the "better" part, and watch all...

At least they are wearing hard hats. You know, just in case an annihilation occurs

Probably AI writing the drivers anymore

Wasn’t the Pro the model that they promised to build in the US a few years ago for some sort of incentive?

I’m betting CPUs get pretty inexpensive now that RAM is choking off people from upgrading Gotta try to entice people to do drop-in upgrades

Maybe they just figured out how to do it?

That’s fine But the original article obviously doesn’t agree and has data on the models they tested. I’m sure there are always outliers, and the article only tested some subset of all screens available. All I did was summarize the article for the tl;dr’s out here

Steam runs, even has Big Picture Mode and everything on OS X. Apple does have an App Store on OS X, but it isn't nearly as big as it is on iOS, since OS X is open and not a walled garden, so no need for Valve to break into the walled garden and fork over 30% as long as it stays on OS X and...

Why would Apple partner with Valve when Apple brings in almost 10x the revenue that Valve does, just on App Store Gaming revenue alone, let alone everything else Apple creates revenue with. Apple could buy Valve outright five times over just with the cash they have on hand if they wanted to...

For the Apple unbelievers, and folks that are just flat out in denial, I'll just throw this out there: From Wikipedia - List of Largest Video Game companies So, a lot of companies making a lot of money, for sure. Apple would be top of the list though, if you considered them a publisher...

hahaha like nVidia would ever allow you to mate their product with an inferior brand. You'll be lucky if it doesn't require whatever the latest generation is, just because they can do that and force sales. (you have a good point though, despite my joking)

I mean, if we keep going down this path - graphics programming won't be anything other than a series of AI prompts.

I'm in camp "Jaded and salty because I don't have the hardware to run this"

It’s the same conundrum we had when mining boomed —- if you can sell every single piece of hardware that you make at a higher margin, why do you bother continuing to support lower margin uses? The constraint is manufacturing - they can’t just scale up fabs fast enough to support the demand, and...