Search results

Thing is, people bitch about nvidia every day, all day long. They don't care about gamers, fake frames, ****ty upscaling, skyrocket prices and the list goes on. Yet nvidia has more than 90% market share on gaming cards. People is not voting with their wallets.

I said ever since AI became a thing that it would eventually complement/replace RT/PT. Brute force just doesn't cut it, even if you only raytrace some parts. This seems like the natural evolution. Thing is nvidia went too far with the overuse of Botox in its first demo.

I have a feeling that the dual 5090 setup was just for bragging rights. Wouldn't be as impressive if it just used a RTX5060 for DLSS5. We'll know for sure in a few months

I think the Lossless Scaling tools lets you use a 2nd card to do the upscaling/framegen

multigpu requieres developer support. No one wants to implement it for some reason.

Why are people so fixated on the dual RTX5090? It's a proof of concept so to speak, lots of work and optimization to do until release. I think nvidia rushed too early to show it, but it was all it had to show pc gaming wise. No mention of next gen gaming cards at all, not even in the pipeline.

I think nvidia needs a new acronym for its AI derived technologies. It got bad enough with framegen, but now this? From what I've seen so far, it looks great on some games, different but not necessarily better in others and worse in the rest. Lot's more of tweaking to do. The big question...

Of the "big 3" I actually see AMD moving away from PC gaming, it has the most to gain moving to AI, even if they manage to grab the same market share they have in pc gaming, it would be orders of magnitud more profitable. And other than consoles, they are not dominant in any other market, so...

Yeah, just like FSR4.1 is similar to DLSS 4.5... NOT!!! The Steam Machine doesn't even have RDNA 3.5.

tnx

So, as I said, it doesn't.

AFAIK RDNA3 does not support FSR4, much less 4.1.

I think the Frame could be the real Gem

I have little faith the GabeCube will succeed. For me it's too little too late. The steamdeck didn't really have competition, but the Steam Machine will compete both with consoles and gaming pcs. If it wants to cater to the casual gamer, it better be cheap, the rumored target was around $700...

Tell that to the xbox rog ally (or any other PC that uses Game Pass Ultimate), you can play xbox titles on it... via streaming.

I don't think it will even have a "xbox decoder", I mean there is no point on having Xbox exclusives anymore that won't work on PC (xbox exclusives are few and good ones even fewer). As I said before xbox, retro compatibility will most likely be from streaming, why give the player free access to...

That actually sounds accurate. On the consumer GPU side AMD has little to gain, they can't compete at a flagship level which make them look like a 2nd tier. So even if they gain market share, the revenue won't be as great. They also have little market share on the AI market, but the potential...

5x? you are so cute... ;) ;)

They've had the opportunity before and they didn't take it.

I have a feeling that retro compatibility will come from streaming, like with the Xbox Rog Ally.