Big Navi, on par with 2080Ti/RTX3070 or head to head with 3080?

wccftech is utter and absolute click bait garbage

Would mostly agree... however there times (like URL below) that they talk about real released products with benchmarks and published information -- They took 11 games. test shading performance only, no DLSS, and no RTX -- and found that the RTX 3090 was on avg 33% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti. This means, for the most part, the card is acting like a 23.5 TFLOPs GPU -- They (in URL) published benchmarks.

 
Would mostly agree... however there times (like URL below) that they talk about real released products with benchmarks and published information -- They took 11 games. test shading performance only, no DLSS, and no RTX -- and found that the RTX 3090 was on avg 33% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti. This means, for the most part, the card is acting like a 23.5 TFLOPs GPU -- They (in URL) published benchmarks.

According to the same article, there's the potential for huge performance gains, like we've already seen in rendering applications from Brent's review.

Keep in mind that AMD has historically have better shader (compute) theoretical performance than nvidia, yet it never translated in gaming performance (even with RDNA), actually not even compute performance for that matter, only in a few scenarios AMD came on top.

Case in point, RX5700XT 11Tflops vs RTX2070 7.5tflops, by the same token you could argue that the 11tflop card was acting like a 7tflop gpu.
 
According to the same article, there's the potential for huge performance gains, like we've already seen in rendering applications from Brent's review.

Keep in mind that AMD has historically have better shader (compute) theoretical performance than nvidia, yet it never translated in gaming performance (even with RDNA), actually not even compute performance for that matter, only in a few scenarios AMD came on top.

Case in point, RX5700XT 11Tflops vs RTX2070 7.5tflops, by the same token you could argue that the 11tflop card was acting like a 7tflop gpu.

To assume case in point, we need to assume AMD's next gen Navi is no better (or worst than) the current gen Navi -- Also in some games 5700 XT holds it own reaching 2080 (not super) level of performance (of course can cherry pick either way) -- When it comes to 3000 series, its not assumption (data), it's actual benchmarks -- So sure, if AMD makes no improvements from gen to gen, its possible the 6900 XT lands between 3070 and 3080 -- However if they make a little effort (improvement), its entirely possible to exceed the 3080 with 6900 XT -- Release a 6950 XT HBM2, and its not hard to image a 6950 XT trading blows (or even exceeding) 3090.

My guess is still that AMD will have a top card that mixes it up with the 3080 -- also think they will announce in Oct. like we've heard, with Nov. shipping date allowing them to do their best to get cards into those buying on day 1, and will have worked out things well with AIB partners too. It's been many gen's of cards that I've lost my faith (paper launch, mid level performance cards, etc...) in AMD, however, Lisa Su won't have this be a repeat.
 
Just leaving this here: https://www.pcworld.com/article/341...d-struggles-to-deliver-its-flagship-chip.html

AMD is no stranger to "Paper Launches". There's been more too. Lisa Su is no magician.

We've seen the sales numbers now being its well past the launch -- AMD is killing it in sales, demand was strong, still is strong -- It was mostly 3900X that sold as much as AMD could supply at release, then again oddly enough retail (microcenter) had them.

We are crossing into fan boy stuff -- and for record, I'm one of those people (lol), a Titan RTX owner, and each before it -- It's been awhile (other than Volta and its price) since AMD got my attention. It's OK to disagree if you feel AMD will launch next gen Navi with little stock and not be competitive in the upper performance segments -- normally I would prolly agree with you, but, not this time is all.


There's the sales numbers for AMD:
 
To assume case in point, we need to assume AMD's next gen Navi is no better (or worst than) the current gen Navi -- Also in some games 5700 XT holds it own reaching 2080 (not super) level of performance (of course can cherry pick either way) -- When it comes to 3000 series, its not assumption (data), it's actual benchmarks -- So sure, if AMD makes no improvements from gen to gen, its possible the 6900 XT lands between 3070 and 3080 -- However if they make a little effort (improvement), its entirely possible to exceed the 3080 with 6900 XT -- Release a 6950 XT HBM2, and its not hard to image a 6950 XT trading blows (or even exceeding) 3090.

My guess is still that AMD will have a top card that mixes it up with the 3080 -- also think they will announce in Oct. like we've heard, with Nov. shipping date allowing them to do their best to get cards into those buying on day 1, and will have worked out things well with AIB partners too. It's been many gen's of cards that I've lost my faith (paper launch, mid level performance cards, etc...) in AMD, however, Lisa Su won't have this be a repeat.
Again, given the current rumored specs, Big Navi would match a RTX3700. IF AMD has another chip that can deliver 28Tflops with HBM2 then YES it should rival and maybe even beat a RTX3090
 
They took a panel of 11 games to test games on shading performance only, no DLSS, and no RTX. There wasn't a particular methodology to picking the titles - they just benched the games had lying around -- and found that the RTX 3090 was on avg 33% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti. This means, for the most part, the card is acting like a 23.5 TFLOPs GPU.

[/URL][/URL]
Not clicking on WCCF Tech, but I'm guessing they're including sub-4K resolutions. At 4K it averages 48% faster. Take out the outliers and it is 50%. Bell curve shows the majority of variances lie between 36% and 60% (+/- 1 Std Dev). Std. Dev. = 12.29%

AverageAverage
67.5572​
99.519​
47.88%​
GameOutletRTX 2080 TiRTX 3090Variance
Anno 1800ComputerBase
41.20​
51.90​
25.97%​
Anno 1800cowcotland
48.00​
75.00​
56.25%​
Anno 1800TechPowerUp
46.40​
67.50​
45.47%​
Ashes of the SingularityThink Computers
126.20​
130.00​
3.01%​
Assassin's Creed Odysseycowcotland
47.00​
71.00​
51.06%​
Assassin's Creed OdysseyTechPowerUp
47.00​
71.40​
51.91%​
Battlefield VGuru3D
79.00​
124.00​
56.96%​
Battlefield VTechPowerUp
87.70​
128.00​
45.95%​
Borderlands 3ComputerBase
48.30​
74.70​
54.66%​
Borderlands 3Guru3D
50.00​
78.00​
56.00%​
Borderlands 3Hexus
43.00​
69.00​
60.47%​
Borderlands 3TechPowerUp
49.00​
83.10​
69.59%​
Borderlands 3Think Computers
48.02​
67.77​
41.13%​
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2019ComputerBase
67.20​
97.10​
44.49%​
Civilization VIHexus
98.00​
119.00​
21.43%​
Civilization VITechPowerUp
121.20​
182.90​
50.91%​
ControlComputerBase
38.30​
54.60​
42.56%​
ControlKitGuru
38.00​
59.00​
55.26%​
ControlTechPowerUp
34.80​
58.30​
67.53%​
Death StrandingComputerBase
79.80​
114.90​
43.98%​
Death StrandingGuru3D
81.00​
123.00​
51.85%​
Death StrandingKitGuru
75.00​
115.00​
53.33%​
Death StrandingTechPowerUp
75.80​
114.20​
50.66%​
Death StrandingTechspot
83.00​
113.00​
36.14%​
Detroit: Become HumanTechPowerUp
64.40​
107.30​
66.61%​
Devil May Cry 5TechPowerUp
77.60​
139.20​
79.38%​
Divinity: Original Sin IITechPowerUp
96.20​
149.40​
55.30%​
DOOM EternalComputerBase
109.00​
168.40​
54.50%​
DOOM EternalTechPowerUp
116.70​
180.80​
54.93%​
DOOM EternalTweakTown
98.00​
156.00​
59.18%​
F1 2020ComputerBase
84.60​
124.50​
47.16%​
F1 2020Guru3D
94.00​
143.00​
52.13%​
F1 2020TechPowerUp
105.20​
172.20​
63.69%​
Far Cry 5cowcotland
72.00​
108.00​
50.00%​
Far Cry 5TechPowerUp
81.80​
119.10​
45.60%​
Far Cry: New DawnGuru3D
79.00​
104.00​
31.65%​
Far Cry: New DawnHexus
77.00​
96.00​
24.68%​
Far Cry: New DawnHot Hardware
77.00​
92.00​
19.48%​
Far Cry: New DawnKitGuru
84.00​
116.00​
38.10%​
Far Cry: New DawnThink Computers
79.00​
108.00​
36.71%​
Far Cry: New DawnTweakTown
81.00​
90.00​
11.11%​
Forza Horizon 4Hexus
75.00​
109.00​
45.33%​
Gears 5cowcotland
57.00​
83.00​
45.61%​
Gears 5Guru3D
61.00​
84.00​
37.70%​
Gears 5Hexus
60.00​
86.00​
43.33%​
Gears 5KitGuru
56.00​
85.00​
51.79%​
Gears 5TechPowerUp
62.80​
99.40​
58.28%​
Gears TacticsComputerBase
41.90​
59.00​
40.81%​
Gears TacticsHot Hardware
56.60​
73.40​
29.68%​
Grand Theft Auto Vcowcotland
68.00​
99.00​
45.59%​
Grid 2019cowcotland
84.00​
117.00​
39.29%​
Hitman 2cowcotland
63.00​
101.00​
60.32%​
Hitman 2TechPowerUp
62.00​
94.90​
53.06%​
Horizon Zero DawnComputerBase
47.10​
71.80​
52.44%​
Horizon Zero DawnTechspot
51.00​
79.00​
54.90%​
Metro ExodusComputerBase
37.80​
55.70​
47.35%​
Metro ExodusGuru3D
50.00​
78.00​
56.00%​
Metro ExodusHot Hardware
52.26​
75.52​
44.51%​
Metro ExodusKitGuru
77.00​
115.00​
49.35%​
Metro ExodusTechPowerUp
72.90​
116.10​
59.26%​
Metro ExodusThink Computers
62.32​
89.47​
43.57%​
Metro ExodusTweakTown
43.00​
63.00​
46.51%​
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020Guru3D
35.00​
45.00​
28.57%​
Middle-earth: Shadow of WarKitGuru
63.00​
94.00​
49.21%​
Middle-earth: Shadow of WarTweakTown
83.00​
114.00​
37.35%​
Project CARS 3TechPowerUp
59.90​
84.70​
41.40%​
Red Dead Redemption 2ComputerBase
43.30​
61.20​
41.34%​
Red Dead Redemption 2cowcotland
47.00​
79.00​
68.09%​
Red Dead Redemption 2Hot Hardware
53.42​
75.84​
41.97%​
Red Dead Redemption 2KitGuru
49.00​
70.00​
42.86%​
Red Dead Redemption 2TechPowerUp
49.70​
78.50​
57.95%​
Red Dead Redemption 2TweakTown
52.00​
76.00​
46.15%​
Resident Evil 3ComputerBase
77.90​
115.90​
48.78%​
Resident Evil 3Guru3D
76.00​
116.00​
52.63%​
Sekiro: Shadows Die TwiceTechPowerUp
80.50​
119.40​
48.32%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderComputerBase
52.60​
73.60​
39.92%​
Shadow of the Tomb Raidercowcotland
41.00​
64.00​
56.10%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderGuru3D
59.00​
95.00​
61.02%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderHexus
63.00​
94.00​
49.21%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderKitGuru
57.00​
88.00​
54.39%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderTechPowerUp
68.60​
109.10​
59.04%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderThink Computers
78.00​
106.00​
35.90%​
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderTweakTown
77.00​
112.00​
45.45%​
Star Wars: Jedi Fallen OrderTechPowerUp
56.10​
91.60​
63.28%​
Strange BrigadeGuru3D
90.00​
154.00​
71.11%​
Strange BrigadeTechPowerUp
98.50​
160.00​
62.44%​
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntGuru3D
78.00​
102.00​
30.77%​
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntTechPowerUp
82.20​
130.90​
59.25%​
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: BreakpointComputerBase
32.90​
49.80​
51.37%​
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: BreakpointKitGuru
57.00​
88.00​
54.39%​
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlandscowcotland
47.00​
65.00​
38.30%​
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: SiegeTechspot
135.00​
201.00​
48.89%​
Tom Clancy's The Division 2ComputerBase
49.20​
74.60​
51.63%​
Tom Clancy's The Division 2cowcotland
50.00​
76.00​
52.00%​
Tom Clancy's The Division 2KitGuru
55.00​
88.00​
60.00%​
Total War Saga: TroyKitGuru
46.00​
66.00​
43.48%​
Trackmania 2020ComputerBase
67.90​
93.40​
37.56%​
Wolcen: Lords of MayhemComputerBase
53.90​
77.80​
44.34%​
Wolfenstein: YoungbloodHot Hardware
111.00​
162.00​
45.95%​
Wolfenstein: YoungbloodThink Computers
110.00​
150.00​
36.36%​
 
Again, given the current rumored specs, Big Navi would match a RTX3700. IF AMD has another chip that can deliver 28Tflops with HBM2 then YES it should rival and maybe even beat a RTX3090

It's entirely possible I suppose that the next gen Navi will take a step (or two) backwards in advancements and be a bit of a failure sure... you asked a question of "Big Navi, on par with 2080Ti/RTX3070 or head to head with 3080?" -- clearly Stoly, you meant, I'm telling you its going to be a 3070 match, and there's no question to it... lol -- For me, the leaks should be taken yet with a grain of salt, and feel there's a solid chance we see AMD hit the 3080 performance level.
 
Purely testing games on shading performance only, no DLSS, and no RTX (more of their comments from the bench testing is below):

"We found that the RTX 3090 was on avg 33% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti. This means, for the most part, the card is acting like a 23.5 TFLOPs GPU. Performance is obviously taking a major hit as we move from rendering applications to games. There is a vast differential between the performance targets the RTX series should be hitting and the one its actually outputting."

"Here, however, we can only guess. Since there is a lot of fluctuation between various games, game engine scaling is obviously a factor and the drivers don't appear to be capable of fully taking advantage of the 10,000+ cores that the RTX 3090 possesses."
 

Attachments

  • NVIDIA-RTX-30-Scaling-Gaming-Applications.jpg
    NVIDIA-RTX-30-Scaling-Gaming-Applications.jpg
    462.6 KB · Views: 2
[QUOTE="nEo717, post: 19455, member: 447]
It's entirely possible I suppose that the next gen Navi will take a step (or two) backwards in advancements and be a bit of a failure sure... you asked a question of "Big Navi, on par with 2080Ti/RTX3070 or head to head with 3080?" -- clearly Stoly, you meant, I'm telling you its going to be a 3070 match, and there's no question to it... lol -- For me, the leaks should be taken yet with a grain of salt, and feel there's a solid chance we see AMD hit the 3080 performance level.
[/QUOTE]
based on what? wishful thinking?

Once again, given the current specs it would be more in line with a 3070. I still take them with a grain of salt, but we are only a few weeks away from release, so I don't really spect big surprises. I mean a month ago ampere rumors were mostly on par with the final specs.

At least on paper VegaVII had the specs on its side to speculate that it could stand up against the RTX280Ti. We know how that went.
RDNA2 doesn't even look that good on paper.

I'll give you this though. For years Nv shader performance (Tflops) ended up being faster than AMD in spite of AMD being faster on paper. With RDNA vs Turing it became much closer. It seems to me that RDNA2 vs Ampere shader performance might even tipped the scale in AMDs favor. But I don't think it will be enough for BigNavi to fight the RTX3080.

And as much as I may sound as an nvidiot, rest assured that if the Big Navi ends up being faster, I'll be happy to eat my words and even vote with my wallet for BigNavi.
 
Infinity Cache, RX 6000 series is rumored to feature that -- Is that even possible if the rumored (just 256-bit bus interface) bus sizes are correct? Makes me wonder if we won't end up seeing a HBM2 top end model with Infinity Cache perhaps, unless rumors are simply off on bus sizes and such...
 
What, exactly, do we know about "Infinity Cache" and it's effect on GPU performance levels?
 
What, exactly, do we know about "Infinity Cache" and it's effect on GPU performance levels?
Other than nothing?:LOL::ROFLMAO:

its a trademark, not even a patent. So I wouldn't get high hopes.

But its supposed to be the the next big thing since sliced bread, its the secret sauce that could make Big Navi go head to head with the RTX3080.
 
Last edited:
This sounds like another round of 'that one feature' that AMD has that will make all the difference.

We've been here before...

Indeed we have. NVIDIA had a name for its compression algorithm used for the 9800GX2's 256bit bus. I can't remember what it was called but it didn't work so well. The 9800GX2 (even in Quad-SLI) were inferior to the 8800GTX's in 3-Way or 4-Way SLI for that very reason. The GPU's were starved for memory bandwidth.

I used to run a 3-Way 8800GTX SLI setup. I was pissed when I picked up dual 9800GX2's on launch day and CoD:MW ran much worse as a result of my very expensive purchase. Unfortunately, I had sold off my 8800GTX's by that point and was more or less stuck with the 9800GX2's.
 
Last edited:
6900XT about on par with 3090 in rasterization with SAM enabled, but falls 30-40% short in ray tracing.


Did Brent get one for review?
 
Become a Patron!
Back
Top