I will say though, only one episode in, Picard is not bad so far...
Yeah, It's not bad. I wouldn't call it great either. I wonder if it feels better just because we haven't seen anything really good in a while.
Mostly Echoing Dan's breakdown on the Hardforums, some examples of stuff that is just off or weird or just not right are as follows:
1.) Star trek technology was always made up, but it used to at least follow some sort of reason, and be more believable. Recreating an entire android from a single "neuron" bit was just kind of ridiculous.
2.) The premise also does not make sense. The Romulan empire was a huge many solar system empire in previous series, now it has been all but completely destroyed just to one supernova?
3.) Why would a malfunctioning android attack on Mars result in Starfleet abandoning helping the Romulan evacuation?
It goes on and on. Patrick Stewart lends some credit to it, but the writing just does not appear to live up to some of the better Trek around Season 3 - 6 TNG and most of DS9.
It is a Sci-fi series, so of course, lots of things are made up, I feel like I read at some point that the Trek writing staff back in the 80s and 90's had some people with scientific and diplomatic/geopolitical/history backgrounds working with them in order to fact check and make things at least seem plausible. They also had strong showrunners that kept things on topic, and insisted the episodes didn't break too much with Canon. I feel like that depth in the writing is missing both with Discovery and with the little we have seen of Picard thus far.
Don't get me wrong. I'm probably still going to watch it. I like having some Trek to watch again. It's just not coming anywhere close to living up to my best memories of Trek.
That said, it's also not as bad as the worst of Trek. (Certain episodes of Voyager, I'm looking at you) At least we have that.