Don't know what issues you're talking about. My Ryzen 1800 and 3700 system ran fine from the first boot. I never had issues in the socket 939 days either.
Some got lucky, some didn't. Some had the gall to try
Linux. Like that would ever work!
(AMD did replace the CPUs...)
I gotta chime in here... my 3900x build was as smooth as butter. You're not migrating OS disk from Intel builds to AMD builds are you?
I doubt that just putting it out there.
I would hope; AMD had most of the kinks worked out by then, and had better coordination with their partners, and memory manufacturers had a better handle on what works, and what doesn't.
I've actually done platform migrations too- not recommended, not because it can't or doesn't work, but that performance- and stability-sapping cruft may be left behind. Better not leave it to chance and wind up having to do all the work again later.
Yeah I have no complaints with my old reliable 2700 either
Edit: Actually I never had any CPU issues period, Intel or AMD /shrug
I haven't had any that weren't self-inflicted, but CPUs don't run by themselves; I wound up running Pentium 4's for a time because I was tired of VIA chipset stability.
AMDs biggest issue on the CPU side this time around was partner implementations. Driver issues were minimal and the hardware itself is solid, they just had companies building shoddy motherboards and had to surmount the issues involved in breaking in a new memory controller.
I was already recommending the 2000-series once they got X470 stable and pre-tuned memory kits started hitting the market. That release hit a bit too late for me personally, but that's what I would have bought had I been in the market. At this point I can't really fathom buying an Intel product if given the choice; my new XPS 15 has one simply because that's what they come with. I'd have happily taken a 4900H instead.
Well, sort of. AMD still needs to get Thunderbolt support sorted out to shipping products
.