Search results

All the rumors I have seen up until now indicate 4070 TI levels of performance. If it was 4080 levels I may bite on that depending on the price.

<snark> Q. So the V-Cache trade-offs are worse than the trade-off from ARL? .......... <sound of crickets> .......... A. Well you see... </snark> (Yes I know its not that simple an answer)

I believe its two things: 1. Consumers buy products that suck on the promise that they will be fixed later 2. Development practices that involve the term: MVP (Minimum Viable Product) Number 2 combined with number 1 just continuously lowers the bar for number 2.

I mean .... isnt this a comment about the developer vs the hardware? Sounds to me like - Oh BTW - We spent no time on the PC version at all.

Im super excited about this. Having played tabletop back before the clans were introduced I think this will be great. I hope the to an expansion that is from the IS side where they try to repel the clan invasion.

Thanks sir! Cool to understand how the lifespan is speced, and makes alot of sense.

Yeah for sure, but is starwars a AAA game? I didnt really think that classified. From the play I wouldnt expect more than 3 years dev time with any decent sized team.

@Brent_Justice Thanks for the great review! I loved the detail and pictures this is the kind of review I like to see. I appreciate the hard work! I have been concerned about buying a Asrock MB as a friend of mine had no end of issues with his, but the new Tachi seems to punch all my buttons. So...

its bad when ~70m doesnt break even for a game. Somethings wrong there. I would love to see the development budget breakdown.

They stood by Cyberpunk tho and now its a pretty good game. There is alot of credit for that.

Just wait until this BS starts with you cars automotive screen =)

@Zarathustra But thanks for the nice write up and suggestions! Sadly I work some where that the gear never lands in anyones home after its out of support. Im an Infrastructure Guy by trade, so yeah Im fully aware of the combinations, as the stuff I work with is usally using 100/400Gbps...

Yeah but new ones still are not cheap! You bring up a good point.... I should look used. I usually never do but this.... yeah...

Now someone get me an 16 port 10gbe switch for a reasonable price!

Sorry, wasn't implying that. I was cheering on your Cenozoic era comment with something and someone else from that period.

Voodoo forever! (And Billy!) While they are less than Intel they are doing increasingly better nearly every year for the last few, which is a great trend for them. Lots of Cloud contracts etc. But they are still in the growing phase here, so I think this trend will continue for a while at...

This statement has been proven wrong for about the last decade, as it never gets them to a better market share. They just leave money on the table from the share they have. AMD does need to catch up on marketing themselves and features, hopefully the new guy in charge of unified architecture...

I don't disagree with the scenario you proposed (in spirit), but historically AMD lowering prices doesn't take much of NVidia market share. Maybe a decade ago was the last time that worked and coincidence they had the best performing card at that time period. I dont think it has happened since...

I think history shows that AMD providing better performance/$ doesn't gain them market share. The 3050, while costing more was outselling AMD's better performing competition. I would be nice if AMD could gain market share but them doing that by pricing has failed quite often.

By "They" you mean everyone right?