- Joined
- May 6, 2019
- Messages
- 3,287
- Points
- 113
So, what changed?
What do you mean?
So, what changed?
What do you mean?
Why was there the move to what seems like total software control?
We have no way of knowing for sure, but I can take a semi-educated guess.
The primary reason is probably because it was simply easier to do it that way at the time. I suspect that it comes down to the fact that NVIDIA's SLI was hastily implemented. It only came about due to the fact that PCI-Express allowed us to have more than one of the same level of graphics card in our systems. With AGP, it wasn't possible. Some genius at NVIDIA probably saw all those PCIe x16 slots and decided that NVIDIA needed to fill them with graphics cards to make more money. Early SLI was always a hack job at best. It was more elegant than early Crossfire, which was a knee jerk reaction to NVIDIA's SLI by ATi.
Interesting.
Wasn't the first edition of crossfire more akin to 3dfx SLI? Stretching some memory at this point, but that external cable put the frame back together and one of the cards simply controlled timing?
Well, as somebody who has been a multi-GPU user since the 6800 GTX days, I am hoping against hope that someone
will step up and fix this.
SLi and Crossfire, when implemented properly are like a house on fire.
But sadly, the whole thing seems dead.
I guess better for the bank account.
I get that.Not really. In the era of single card and single GPU dominance, NVIDIA jacked the prices of their highest end part to almost double that of its former flagship gaming cards.