AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Tops UserBenchmark, Beating Intel Core i9-10900K

Peter_Brosdahl

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
9,032
Points
113
amd-ryzen-5-5000-series-box.jpg
Image: AMD



Benchmark scores for AMD’s Ryzen 5 5600X continue to appear ahead of its release. This 6C/12T processor is shaping up to be an amazing value for those who may have been eyeing more expensive options for their gaming and productivity needs. New scores from UserBenchmark have been posted on r/AMD, and they show this $299 processor beating Intel’s $549 offering on average.



UBM-5600X-vs-10900K-1024x576.png
Image: UserBenchmark



Many may question the usefulness of a single benchmark tool, as real-world usage is always the final word on how technology should be measured, but the Ryzen 5 5600X has managed to score favorably in three different tests in recent weeks. Yesterday, it managed to...
Click to expand...

Continue reading...


 
Wait, the 6 core is the $299 chip now? Well, launch prices anyway. Guess I might be waiting a bit for price drops
 
This is the same User Benchmark that praises Intel's core i3 and spits on AMD, nice....
 
JosiahBradley said:
This is the same User Benchmark that praises Intel's core i3 and spits on AMD, nice....
Click to expand...
From a single-core perspective, up to this point, that'd be fair though. Your typical desktop user is fine with two cores, four being plenty, so the speed of those cores is what differentiates them.
 
LazyGamer said:
From a single-core perspective, up to this point, that'd be fair though. Your typical desktop user is fine with two cores, four being plenty, so the speed of those cores is what differentiates them.
Click to expand...
You may want to read this to familiarize yourself with the scam site known as UserBenchmarks.
thinkcomputers.org

UserBenchmark gets cancelled for biased component rating, drama

PC component rating website 'UserBenchmark' faces a near-universal backlash from multiple DIY PC subreddits and its moderators. This is due to its inaccurate benchmark and rating system which misguided many unsuspecting readers, therefore ending not
thinkcomputers.org thinkcomputers.org
ownsnap.com

UserBenchmark Biased Admin Makes Unfair Reviews Against AMD Hardware Thus Loses Credibility Among PC Builders

UserBenchmark is the most controversial website that provides unfair benchmark tool to assess your real-time hardware performance scores including CPU, GPU,
ownsnap.com ownsnap.com

Hardware Unboxed does a great piece on it as well.
 
Ah, those guys. Aren't they the folks that Steve from GN ambushed?
 
UserBenchmark may suck on results, but they have the database/interface thing down.

You want to compare a C2Q to a Zen3? A 3090 to a 8200? It will let you. I like it for no other reason than I can get some relative performance comparison between older hardware that people are wanting to ugprade, and let them know about how much faster they can expect something to run for their money. Most all other tech review sites only stay within the latest generation or two, so making those comparisons against older hardware is... hard to find.

I wish I could find a better database that has similar results. Anand used to have something similar, but they hadn't been keeping up with it for a while.

Yeah, I know it's skewed to all hell and back. But I'm not looking for anything absolute - just something high level and relative.
 
Brian_B said:
UserBenchmark may suck on results, but they have the database/interface thing down.

You want to compare a C2Q to a Zen3? A 3090 to a 8200? It will let you. I like it for no other reason than I can get some relative performance comparison between older hardware that people are wanting to ugprade, and let them know about how much faster they can expect something to run for their money. Most all other tech review sites only stay within the latest generation or two, so making those comparisons against older hardware is... hard to find.

I wish I could find a better database that has similar results. Anand used to have something similar, but they hadn't been keeping up with it for a while.

Yeah, I know it's skewed to all hell and back. But I'm not looking for anything absolute - just something high level and relative.
Click to expand...
I'm with you on this one. Anand used to do it well, but not these days.. :(
 
Burticus said:
Yeah the guys that used to keep their "bench" app updated all seem to have left or no longer care.
Click to expand...
That and Anand himself has been gone for... a decade or so?

Brian_B said:
I wish I could find a better database that has similar results.
Click to expand...
That would certainly be nice. Especially if you could narrow down the applications and so on, and if that were representative, then you'd be able to show where more cores might be better than faster cores and vice-versa.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Become a Patron!
Back
Top