As far as clockspeeds I would be very surprised if Zen 6 will sustain 6GHz under load (like 8 or 10 cores loaded up) much less 7GHz. Not that I'm not hoping for it, but 6GHz has been a "speed barrier" for quite some time
6GHz is more or less 'right there'; it really seems that AMD and Intel have other fish to fry before doing the engineering to make that possible, because small bumps in clockspeed are fairly meaningless now. Might actually be detrimental if they make sacrifices to get there i.e. adding pipeline stages a la Netburst.
Intel broke it briefly with Raptor Lake only to have degradation issues.
Well, the P-cores could handle that and more, no question. They're
stout. Raptor Lake's problem seemed to be rather the bus that shared its voltage plane with the CPU cores, so that when a P-core or two would jump up in clockspeed and require a burst of juice, even while the rest of the CPU was using much less power, that bus could be damaged. And once that degradation hit a tipping point it was game over unfortunately.
But Intel could absolutely build a solid 6+GHz part too, if that were a design goal.
I'd say that it'd be easier for Intel to push clockspeeds than AMD, given
currently released products, but realistically either could do a 7GHz SKU if that was an engineering goal they wanted to hit.
The bigger question is whether it'd make a difference vs. putting their resources into increases in IPC or reducing latency instead.