I think you just nailed it. Vapor chambers and all.Can't wait for water cooled monitors!
I'd understand if the tech were full-fat, but this is still:This price isn't worth it to me.. but flip side if I was single making what I do now... that would be expensive but not insane budget wise. So some folks will buy them.
You're still benefitting from the 137 PPI. And 8:5 is a dead aspect ratio.I'd understand if the tech were full-fat, but this is still:
At that pixel pitch, folks with good vision are running it at 125% to 150% scaling. 150% makes this display 1440p (literally).
- 32" 4k... so 16:9
- Not per-pixel backlighting
- Only 'exceptional' for how bright it can get
That's where I get off the rationalization train
I know, and having one, I can say that it's sharp; but it's still not much of an upgrade from 27" 1440p, desktop-wise, and gaming-wise, it's just kind of awkward. I'm still not sold on using higher-resolutions for gaming as games just generally do not handle scaling uniformly, especially the older you get. Same problem as with desktop apps of course.You're still benefitting from the 137 PPI.
Oh, I meant to imply even widerAnd 8:5 is a dead aspect ratio.