Former PlayStation Boss Warns That Gaming Subscription Services Could End Up Endangering the Gaming Industry

Peter_Brosdahl

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
9,621
Points
113
Ex-PlayStation CEO Shuhei Yoshida has been keeping busy in his newly embarked retirement and is sharing his thoughts on subscription services.

See full article...
 
I mean that's a big no **** right there. New studios will never get the budget to make big titles and big studios will either keep demanding what they want without the sub services until they slip.
 
I'm honestly not too worried for the gaming industry.

The only thing at risk, really, are those huge AAA money pits. And for the most part, I'm fine with that.

The nice thing about gaming is that it's an industry where if you have some passion, and a good idea, and a good work ethic, and a bit of good luck - you can make something, and it could go big. I could rattle off a dozen small indie hits right now, and while not all of them are to my taste - a surprising number are. My number 1 favorite title (Factorio) is from a no-name outfit out of Eastern Europe that started out with 3 guys, and I think they might be up to ... 7 guys now?

There are tools out there to make games, heck, you don't even need to know how to code anymore. A bit of vibe coding and some shopping on an asset storefront and you could put together something playable in short order. Now, whether that's a good game or not depends entirely upon ~your~ vision and your ability to implement it.

Now, I do realize, for every small indie hit, there are hundreds of flops - but that's only in a commercial sense. Those folks making those products are writing, and in many cases releasing final products (there the endless "early release" and perpetual Kickstarter stuff, I'm excluding that here). And that is meaningful in it's own way, even if I completely discount the commercial side. It may not put bread on the table, but it's another good line item in a resume, and the more experience you have, the better starting point and further reach you have for the next project.

You don't need a multi-million dollar budget to make a good game. But Grimlakin has a great point about studios that make big titles - the next one always needs to be bigger. And I just am not convinced that it really does. So yeah, the big studios may be in a large amount of trouble, but that's entirely self-inflicted, and probably good for the industry if it does go away.
 
Grimlakin said:
I mean that's a big no **** right there. New studios will never get the budget to make big titles and big studios will either keep demanding what they want without the sub services until they slip.
Click to expand...

I see it differently, I really hope it helps bring the cost of game development down, it's getting ridiculous. If only it went to the working people, the devs, the artists, the testers. But no, these guys get payed peanuts while marketing/management gets the big slice of the cake.
 
I have PC Game pass (again), and yes I could see where it may hurt the industry somewhat, but not enough for them to worry IMO.
 
Bloated budgets, unionization, and the rush to push game prices into triple digits while still pushing the GaaS model is what is killing the industry.
 
Armenius said:
Bloated budgets, unionization, and the rush to push game prices into triple digits while still pushing the GaaS model is what is killing the industry.
Click to expand...
I'll agree to all of that OTHER than unionization. If you work for EA, or Microsoft/Activision, or other very large publisher especially with how they historically treat developers you NEED a union to represent your group as a unified front. Sure it's prone to abuse, but is it better than the abuse you already are having as a dev?
 
Grimlakin said:
I'll agree to all of that OTHER than unionization. If you work for EA, or Microsoft/Activision, or other very large publisher especially with how they historically treat developers you NEED a union to represent your group as a unified front. Sure it's prone to abuse, but is it better than the abuse you already are having as a dev?
Click to expand...
Studios stopped hiring QA people after the unionization push happened, or they contract it out to slave farms overseas. Yes, that really helped out QA people and did wonders for the state AAA games are released in nowadays.
 
Armenius said:
Studios stopped hiring QA people after the unionization push happened, or they contract it out to slave farms overseas. Yes, that really helped out QA people and did wonders for the state AAA games are released in nowadays.
Click to expand...
Is that the fault of Unions or greedy corporate overlords?
 
There is zero threat to the gaming industry. There is always a posibility of screwing up multimillion dollar investments in making boring repetitive games sure.
Gaming industry will probably get even bigger and more accesible to creators with AI, if anything the problem that will get even worse is identifying the gems. Yes it will get even bigger in my opinion, and yes it will be tons of crap, like always really.
AI might usher other problems, it might make giants produce repetitive 'safe investment' games even faster, and even more cookie cutter sure, but in turn it will allow more new studios of any size express their new ideas faster and better.
Theres is zero worries about the gaming industry. If anything it seems to keep growing.
I used to think, OMG monthly subscription games will destroy the industry, as some games made billions, well , it doesnt work that way, so with pay to win, and on and on its just different models inside a giant industry.
 
I think another E.T. moment is nearly impossible at this point given how big the industry literally is and how diverse it has become. We can all choose to vote with our wallets by not buying the things we don't like and that does have an impact but its also true that when something $$$ucessful that everybody and their dog wants in on the action then the industry is cursed for a bit with clones until the next big thing. As far as the impact of subscription services goes, well, I think its very suspect because we don't really know all the details various publishers or studios are getting and I expect pros and cons for each. I don't use any services, for right now, but that could change down the road but currently I still prefer to "own" a game instead of a time-limited access window. I know there's a whole other angle when it comes to "owning" games but I think we're all mostly on the same page when it comes to the general definition.
 
Uvilla said:
Theres is zero worries about the gaming industry. If anything it seems to keep growing.
I used to think, OMG monthly subscription games will destroy the industry, as some games made billions, well , it doesnt work that way, so with pay to win, and on and on its just different models inside a giant industry.
Click to expand...
I'm not worried about the overall profitability of the industry. It could be the biggest it's ever been with the most revenue ever recorded. But if most of the product are remasters of past glory and trend chasing live services targeting whales, then I consider that very much destroyed.

High quality AAA single player games are rarer and rarer. Most such franchises are on ice, or put out games not worthy of the names.

The state of the industry is well defined by the fact, that at this point there is literally only one game I'm looking forward to. And even that is more cautious optimism than full on enthusiasm.

I think anyone who looks at the gaming industry now and thinks its all fine because of the overall revenue is as far detached from reality on the ground as the bankers and investors and non-gamer executives driving these negative trends.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Become a Patron!
Back
Top