Latest Rumors Suggest That NVIDIA Is Delaying Its RTX 50 SUPER Series Indefinitely, and the RTX 60 Series May Not Arrive Until Mid-2027

[Brian_B]

Like I see some people accepting this. It's 'good enough' to experience higher-end games and it's portable. I could see myself using it if I ever found myself gaming on the go, as I'm certainly never buying another 'gaming' laptop.

But I don't think that this will even begin to replace local hardware for gaming. Augment, expand the market? Sure!

I never thought streaming would supplant physical media either, but here we are. Convenience always seems to trump quality.

I wouldn't be surprised to see that developers specifically start to target the latency issue.. I mean, AI can fix anything, right?

 

[igor_kavinski]

I mean, AI can fix anything, right?

If used properly by experts.

My own example: My rudi_bench had a flawed inner loop generated by Deepseek. Schmide on AT forums with actual assembly language experience and practical knowledge of timing issues helped me fix it. How will I know if something AI gives me is accurate if I lack the basic knowledge to verify it?

 

[Brian_B]

If used properly by experts.

My own example: My rudi_bench had a flawed inner loop generated by Deepseek. Schmide on AT forums with actual assembly language experience and practical knowledge of timing issues helped me fix it. How will I know if something AI gives me is accurate if I lack the basic knowledge to verify it?

First, my attempt at sarcasim obviously failed here

Second, I think your example is an excellent one and is indeed what I’m trying to convey - but I don’t think is where industry executives are heading

 

[Grimlakin]

The issue is there are execs that understand the risks. Problem is those are not c level people.

What happens is company is excited they want AI and all that means now but they want to be careful.

How do they do that?

They create a new c level position that's responsible for AI success in the company.

How is success measured?

Money. Via new money or efficiencies (more work same cost or same work less cost.)

C level success is based on this so they drive forward to more money **** everything else. Leaders who balk are either whipped into shape. Politically powerful enough to resist. Or just see the writing on the wall and try to have a hand on the wheel.

Either way success or failure of AI in the org is attributed ultimately to this new c level person. If company suffers they get fired. If it succeeds the org expects more.