- Joined
- May 6, 2019
- Messages
- 12,871
- Points
- 113
I did 20-30-20 PLP for a while, but the 20s are TN displays with terrible color shift in portrait. i wonder if there is such a thing as a cheap IPS 1600x1200 monitor anymoreSo sure ... nothing wrong with a 20" as long as it isn't the primary display. I remember back in the day having a two 20" (4:3) flat panel setup and that was as good as it got for the times. I really enjoy my 20-30-20 PLP setup, and as I've been looking at more modern screens to possibly increase the size of my primary (say, 34" or 38" at greater resolution), It has been difficult to find secondaries with width that matches the primary monitor's depth in both pixels and physical dimension. So more options for secondaries is good.
All three of my monitors are 2007 vintage Dells (i.e., 30"=3007WFP and 20"=2007FP). I'm fairly sure the 30" is IPS, but the 20"s could be either IPS or PVA. Dell had a panel lottery for those. I'm stretching my memory back much too far to remember these types of details. I've owned and used them for so long, how they're made is no longer of consequence. I also color calibrated the two 20s to match the 30 ... so color shifting isn't as noticeable.I did 20-30-20 PLP for a while, but the 20s are TN displays with terrible color shift in portrait. i wonder if there is such a thing as a cheap IPS 1600x1200 monitor anymore