Unless they improve the cross ccd performance I suspect gains if any will be minimal for gaming workloads.
The gaming drivers feel solid. When I fire up a game all load moves to the x3d ccd. All other cores are parked. Basically my 16 core processor becomes 8 when I game. I would prefer the gaming load be on one ccd and non gaming on tne other... but that doesn't appear to be the case.
That's Zen 6, strongly rumored to be moving to 12 'large' cores per CCD from the current eight. Would also be nice to have a second CCD with Zen6c cores in a dual-CCD part, with another 16-20 cores.
That is an interesting idea. 12 large cores for 24 threads with x3d v cache. And 24 compact cores for 24 threads for light work computation. If they can identify what threads needs what processors and keep.thwt division up under heavy load that would be awesome. I just worry that the scheduler would need custom code from the processes to know.
www.sytronix.co.uk
Yeah, between this and last year's near-unobtanium 9955X3D mobile, that new Intel package in the ASUS NUC, which I think so far is OEM only, along with the rumor about NV bringing back the 3060, while also rumored to wind down some 50 series, manufacturers are not being straightforward about what's happening with fab orders.
