Brian_B
Forum Posting Supreme
- Joined
- May 28, 2019
- Messages
- 8,530
- Reaction score
- 7,232
Maybe they just figured out how to do it?did AMD lie?
Maybe they just figured out how to do it?did AMD lie?
No no no, you have that all wrong.I guess these are valid reasons. But I wish they would've launched both at the same time and let the market decide on which one to keep making more of.
But that lets out a lot of negative energy from disgruntled techies and it could affect future AMD stock performanceThen 9 months or so later, you release the "better" part, and watch all those people who want ~the best~ jump on it too.
People will imagine the benefits because there's more cache.while this sounds great on paper, I don't think there will meaningful real world benefits.
They have said somewhere before that it helps AI workloads so that's their impetus for making it since it aligns well with their current strategy (AYE AYE!). I don't know if you saw Lisa's presentation for when we were expecting her to spill some details on Zen 5. It was 60+ minutes of her repeating the words enterprise and AI. Not going to wake up ever again just to watch another presentation of hers.To me it seems like they are making it just to make it.
We're not even clear what the breadth of those workloads are, we just know what they're not - anything that a desktop user would do, including gaming.It's a lot more expensive for minimal gains under specific workloads.
Technically, you could do a multistation PC, with one CCD allocated to each user. Then you could stop the fighting in the house between kidsWe're not even clear what the breadth of those workloads are, we just know what they're not - anything that a desktop user would do, including gaming.