Music on a 2.1? That's blasphemy! If you think you need a subwoofer for music what you really need is better speakers
With risk of bringing this thread even more off topic than I already have, I wanted to chime in with a thought that may be even more blasphemous.
I used to be in the camp of "music reproduction equipment needs to be as neutral as possible, you want to hear what the artist intended", but the more time I've spent with different songs, remixes, artists, genres and hardware I have changed my mind on this.
1.) Music is about your enjoyment, not necessarily about the artists intents. If you like something bassy, feel free to turn up the bass. Things don't always have to be neutral.
2.) Artists and their sound engineers don't necessarily know what they are doing. Sometimes the official master just sounds like *** on a neutral reproduction, and needs a little adjustment to be enjoyable.
3.) EQ can be a great way to take equipment that isn't quite the right balance for you and improving it.
4.) Positioning matters as well. Right now I have everything dialed in for my seating position right infront of the screen, but if I am listening from across the room,
COMPLETELY different settings are needed for it to sound good. Heck, even changing volume can impact the balance and take something perfectly dialed in and make it sound wrong.
So, I picked a Schiit Lokius EQ recently. I originally got it because I wanted a way to conveniently switch between a "night compatible mode" and "daytime bass" without crawling behind my desk and adjusting the controls on the subwoofer, but what has happened really suprised me, and that is that I have completely embraced the world of EQ.
I was initially worried that it would introduce noise into my analog signal chain, but I wired it with balanced cables, and it sounds completely clean to my ears.
Now my music is all about what sound good
to me, and that is going to change from song to song, from volume level to volume level, from seating position to seating position.
Sometimes I'll be listening to music and I'll have a playlist that includes 1980's new wave stuff (notoriously low bass in mix) and 90's industrial stuff (notoriously high bass) and coming one after another they sound either anemic, or way to boomy. EQ helps me enjoy them all. I wish there were less fiddling involved. A preset feature could help that, and yes, I could have gotten that in software, but I am just not happy with any of the software EQ packages out there. Having the knobs has been enjoyable to me.
Though this would be an area where AI could really be useful. Imagine an EQ that analyzes the sound, and adjust the EQ to one of a few presets you set on your own. Something like:
1.) Near field.
2.) Across room
3.) I'm in a bassy mood
4.) Shh, people are sleeping
The AI could real time analyze a song and use ideal settings so you don't have to adjust things back and forth all the time, sort of like what some media players do with volume equalization between tracks.
Here are my current settings for a song I was listening too which I thought was WAY too V-shaped. It was boomy, and even a little sibilant, but the mids were very disappointing, so I fixed it and as a result I enjoyed the song where otherwise probably wouldn't have...