They could have a space game where you fly around a SINGLE planet and mine asteroids and fight others for rights... and as long as it releases to retail it would STILL OUT STAR CITIZEN, STAR CITIZEN!
I feel like it's been forever since I've looked forward to a game. Now I have this and Diablo.
I think there's some genuine concern about the 'new' functionality being brought in, as well as how poorly Fallout 76 went - but it could also be that Fallout 76 was an afterthought because Bethesda was investing most of its resources in Starfield!
Yeah I played most of those, but beat only a couple.
I was against Fallout 76 by default, it was unnecessary, and not their field of expertise. I mean the creation engine is janky even on single player, it was obvious that it would be a friggin disaster for a multiplayer title. It's as if Ferrari started making city buses, sure they could probably pull it off, but it wouldn't be very good or profitable.
I have put hundreds of hours in Oblivion, Skyrim and F3, only using some cosmetic mods. I have over 100 hours even in F4, which I played the least. The community patches were always news to me, I never actually encountered any of the issues they fixed.
The quirks are a byproduct of the creation engine, there is no fix for that, the creation engine sucks, But just as I enjoyed Cyberpunk 2077 shortly after release, I'm sure I'll enjoy Starfield too. Sometimes gamers seem like such a whiny bunch, oh, there is a T-pose glitch that happened once in the game, now everything is ruined and the game is an 1/10, REEEEEEEEEEEE.
Same for Mass Effect: Andromeda, which I beat in its much-maligned release state, and had a blast. Basically the week of release. I then proceeded to play through it two more times, once at each of the two highest difficulty levels, and it only got better.
I pre-ordered ME:Andromeda, and the internet actually convinced me I made a mistake, until I started playing it and realized it is actually fine.
That's because its real shortcomings only manifest themselves in the second half of the game, a good 25-30 hours into it at least.
I don't think noticing egregious plotholes is a matter of taste. Unless you have a taste for plotholes
Seems like it's kinda the same thing to me, or at the very least two sides of the same coin -- that being some flaw in an entertainment product. Funny how you can accept one but not the other.
Despite owning IdTech, and the availability of UE, Bethesda keeps polishing the turd that is the Creation Engine. Starfield is showing the same failings of every Bethesda game for the last 10+ years. The game could turn out to be very enjoyable, but there is no excuse for the developer's laziness.
A boom visible in frame or janky cgi that's a small flaw equatable to a T-pose glitch in a game, not the entire plot hinging on the characters not seeing something because it's off camera. A graphical or animation glitch and plot holes the size of the moon that completely break down the narrative, are hardly two sides of the same coin.Seems like it's kinda the same thing to me, or at the very least two sides of the same coin -- that being some flaw in an entertainment product. Funny how you can accept one but not the other.