Nothing wrong with that, it'd be much worse if it were 1440p as you'd want to have high enough resolution to run scaling... to make up for the poor pixel structure of Samsung's VA panels.
I have a 43" 4K for my prod system and I love it. I don't know that I would love the extra wideness? Also.... my thing was like $400, this is $1800. I have a 32" 4K for work and it is barely big enough, too many windows open. I could see the benefit of the G9 for work productivity, but it's not made for that, it's made for gaming....... I dunno man. Now if I could see in person a rig like this where it was 2 x 43" 4K curved.... I might be intrigued
Could you do me a favor and relay the actual chord width (i.e., side to side across the curve)? Is it really 52+ inches wide?
The more gently-curved ones just feel natural. Strongly-curved monitors would take a bit getting used to in comparison.
Same here. I used to have a Samsung C27HG70 which had an 1800R curvature. It was awesome for FPS games. I absolutely hated it for everything else. I sold it after about 8 months. I returned to flat and have been very happy since. I also learned that I definitely prefer IPS over VA panels.
Apparently an 1800R curvature matches the curve of human vision. It did feel very natural when playing first-person games. It was incredibly immersive. It felt like my eyeballs were being sucked into the monitor, like my own vision was melding with it. It was neat and interesting. But yeah like I said, curved monitors suck for everything else. I don't exclusively play FPS games, nor do I game 24/7. I do other sh1t with my PC and my time, so a curved monitor wasn't gonna work out for my life.
I switch back and forth between my flat LG C2 and my Alienware curved monitor and honestly have no preference to either other than the C2 is just a better picture overall.
I think it makes a certain amount of sense on these super-wide monitors. For something like my Acer Predator CG47K, it wouldn't make sense.
