Tempest
Quasi-regular
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2022
- Messages
- 396
- Points
- 93
Sounds good! I'll probably hold off for now, at least until I have a better sense of what to expect at the resolution I'd be playing.I got Horizon: Zero Dawn a while back pretty cheap through a Humble Bundle sale and having some credit there. I didn't get far into the game because I didn't have time to concentrate on it (although I will be doing a playthrough somewhat soon) but I was able to play it will enough at 1080p with a Ryzen 5800x and Radeon RX570. Sure, many of the graphical options were turned down but the game still looked good enough to me and for what I did play through the performance was just fine and I'm sure my RX570 is closer to the minimum specs than the recommended. When I start it up again I'll have the advantage of upgrading to an RX 6750xt so I'll be able to turn up any eye candy I want.
Again, I didn't play much but it was **** fun. I'm definitely looking forward to getting back into the game.
The first game was in many respects my favorite. The Witcher 3 was a great game overall (especially with the expansions), but sometimes the player's role felt a little too passive. There's more hand-holding than the previous games, cutscenes accompanied by long-winded speeches weren't always welcome, and too many quests were reduced to "use your witcher senses" — a mechanic that requires no thought from the player. That doesn't exactly read like a great sales pitch for TW3, but those are mostly quibbles that are overshadowed by the positives.Ironically, I've had Witcher 3 for a while now but did little more than run through the intro. I enjoyed the first two games when I played them years ago although the combat for both basically sucks. The story was very enjoyable although the story in the first I found to be better.
If you enjoyed the first games, I'd strongly encourage you to give the third a shot. It may take a little while to get sucked into it. I'd try to at least make it out of the White Orchard before drawing any conclusions, though some find they need to proceed a good ways further before they're hooked. Personally, I found Blood and Wine even better than the main story.
A comment regarding the in-game Gwent card game: I completely ignored it on my first playthrough, and there are no negative consequences (that I can recall) for doing so, but I compulsively collected all the cards on subsequent playthroughs. I thought it was pretty fun and opened up a few interesting side quests, but YMMV.
(I don't know how anyone can manage to just stick to the "main" quests. The end result is always so unsatisfying. Not just in this game, but all story-driven RPGs I've played.)
Best advice is to ignore my ramblings and enjoy the game!
The mechanical aspect of combat is indeed quite clumsy, but its ancillary components such as the skill trees, alchemy, equipment and so forth, can help offset its deficiency and make it more interesting and enjoyable in my opinion. But I would say that is true of all the Witcher games. For what it's worth, I thought TW3 combat was much improved over TW2, minus the weapon and armor repair tedium. (Ugh, just remembered a certain optional encounter in the sewers of Loc Muinne from TW2.) Just don't bother with crossbows. The first Witcher is difficult to compare, as combat was almost RTwP.It's another game in my backlog I expect to play soon although I'm not looking forward to the combat. Combat in the Witcher games has always been the worst part.
If you're anything like me, you might prefer the mouse and KB just for reasons of familiarity, but it certainly can't hurt to try both. I bought a wired Xbox 360 controller years ago for use with certain games, but never found the patience to accustom myself to it. Lately I've been thinking of trying again, but with a modern controller. Not sure if there's a go-to controller for the PC.I recently acquired a cheap gamepad and might try playing with that to see how I do.
For reference, these games are being played under Linux.