Way too many people won't even consider anything other than nVidia. nVidia marketing has some sort of brainwashing or mind control in it.
Consider?
Every time.
End up buying? Eh, maybe one out of three?
Radeon GPUs have had their 'issues' over the years that have limited their utility. I hate to bring up driver issues, but that's always an ongoing question because it's always a moving target. Odd performance issues over the decades have cropped up and been addressed, and every time they iterate on their architecture we have to ask, "what did they break this time?".
Then there's major feature support, currently for things like RT and intelligent upsampling. There's no question that AMD RT + FSR isn't in the same league as Nvidia RT + DLSS2.0+. Not bad in it's own right, but still a step behind.
Finally, support for
every other feature on their GPUs, the video transcoding block being the most visible. RDNA 2 apparently has a perfectly competitive transcoding block that is natively supported by... almost no software. And a big part of that is lack of integration support from AMD themselves, from OBS to Plex to Adobe Premiere. People have been looking to
Intel as the best alternative here simply due to software support!
On balance, not everyone wants or needs their GPU to do much beyond rasterization in games. And at the same time, AMD is clearly listening and clearly working hard to bridge their capability and integration gaps, and apparently mentioned things like OBS and Premiere in their RDNA3 reveal conference. And that's music to my ears!
I'll also say that I picked up an RX6800 to help keep my own perspective in check. It's temporarily serving in the ATX case review rig, but once I get a suitable replacement for it, it'll be back to work alongside a 5800X3D in my ITX gaming rig. My goal is to play as many of my regular games as well as new games on it and to compare the experience against my 12700K / 3080 12GB desktop rig as I can.