the Italian television channel La7 included footage from the DLSS 5 reveal in a recent broadcast and has since copyrighted it. From there, essentially every video on YouTube with DLSS 5 trailer footage was issued a copyright strike and said to be in violation, with the videos taken down with the following message:
"Video unavailable: This video contains content from La7, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds."
This includes NVIDIA's official DLSS 5 announcement trailer, which had 2.3 million views before the supposed copyright strike. What makes this alarming is that the video was taken down with seemingly no human interaction or input, as it's clear that NVIDIA not only created DLSS 5, for better or worse, but also the trailer that has been a hot topic of discussion this year.
Read more:
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/1108...down-due-to-copyright-infringement/index.html
NVIDIA's DLSS 5 trailer has been taken down due to 'copyright' infringement
NVIDIA's DLSS 5 announcement trailer is currently offline on YouTube due to a copyright infringement claim from an unlikely source.
Kosta Andreadis
Senior Editor
Published Apr 5, 2026 9:02 PM CDT
TL;DR: NVIDIA's DLSS 5 trailer, praised for enhancing game visuals but criticized for character faces, was removed from YouTube due to a copyright claim by Italian channel La7. The automated takedown affected all related videos, including NVIDIA's official one, highlighting issues with YouTube's copyright enforcement system.
The system doesn't verify ownership. It verifies who uploaded first to the Content ID database. That's a completely different thing. Whoever registers the fingerprint first becomes the "rights holder" in YouTube's eyes, regardless of who actually made the content.
many creators are complaining about YouTube’s use of AI technology. It is estimated that the platform terminated more than 12 million channels in 2025 due to violations of its terms of service, most of which have been flagged by AI. However, some of the affected creators complained that the reasons for the takedown are inaccurate or false positives. Some even said that their appeals were rejected within a few minutes of sending them, suggesting that the case did not even go under human review.
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-i...ing-the-trailer-it-used-for-its-own-broadcast