LazyGamer
FPS Junkie
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2020
- Messages
- 2,674
- Points
- 113
They've mostly shut up, which can easily be interpreted as 'poor marketing', but honestly?I was referring to mindshare in regards to Intel. They have done a piss poor job of marketing during their troubles.
Given the narrow usecases where they can actually claim superiority in terms of performance, their current marketing stance seems a bit prudent. Maybe they've decided that it's time to put up or shut up with respect to actually replacing Skylake and their 14nm process.
I still don't really see the relationship between Intel and their troubles relating much to Nvidia; if anything, they apply more to AMD, and I don't really think that AMD has the momentum or even really the potential to challenge Nvidia on even footing. They're simply so far behind in the GPU arena and quite lucky to have been in the right place at the right time with respect to winning console business.
There's always going to be these people. I've been accused of being a fanboi or even a shill for all of the major companies at one time or another, and I also find arguments for a company or product line or even a specific release that are based on ephemeral claims or claims on 'faith' to be pretty weak.The Nvidia/drug dealer analogy fits just fine. Drug users are hooked on their preferred substance and are easy to manipulate. The same could be said for Nvidia fan bois (or any fan bois for that matter) it's just that the thing they can't live without is high-end gaming. Both populations are niche, captive to their supplier, and will suspend rational thought/action to acquire the thing that gives them their fix.
All we have on Nvidia right now is that their first batch of a new product got snapped up even faster than usual. Given the performance and price involved, and their relationship to the preceding generation, I don't see anything provably out of order.